Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks below portrait of the Ayatollah Khomeini, Tehran, Iran, March 8, 2025. Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP

Facing deportation, alleged senior Iranian regime member leaves Canada

Minister Joly announces additional sanctions against Iran

From: Global Affairs Canada

News release

March 7, 2025 - Ottawa, Ontario - Global Affairs Canada 

Today, the Honourable Mélanie Joly, Minister of Foreign Affairs, announced that Canada is imposing new sanctions under the Special Economic Measures (Iran) Regulations against Iranian individuals and entities who have engaged in gross human rights violations against Iranian civilians and destabilizing activities in the Middle East region and globally that undermine international peace, security or stability in a manner that is consistent with the policies of Iran.

The Iranian regime continues to demonstrate blatant disregard for human rights, systematically oppressing its own people and spreading instability beyond its borders. From the brutal crackdown on peaceful protesters to the arbitrary detention and execution of dissidents, Iran’s leaders persist in silencing voices of freedom with violence and fear. These egregious violations extend beyond their domestic population, as the regime supports terror groups and threatens regional and global security.

These sanctions target 3 individuals and 4 entities that are Iranian business people and companies connected to procurement networks that acquire and supply sophisticated technology that supports the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ (IRGC’s) weapons production and sales, including to Russia for use in its illegal war against Ukraine.

Canada is listing the following individuals and entities:

Hossein Hatefi Ardakani, head of a transnational procurement network that includes Kavan Electronics Behrad Limited Liability Company, Basamad Electronic Pouya Engineering Limited Liability Company and Teyf Tadbir Arya Engineering Company

Mehdi Gogerdchian, managing director and board member of Iran Aircraft Manufacturing Industries (HESA)

Hossein Pourfarzaneh, lead engineer of Farzanegan Propulsion Design Bureau

Kavan Electronics Behrad Limited Liability Company, a procurement firm

Basamad Electronic Pouya Engineering Limited Liability Company, a procurement firm

Teyf Tadbir Engineering Company, a procurement firm

Farzanegan Propulsion Systems Design Bureau, a technology firm

These new sanctions align with measures taken by Canada’s allies, including the United States, the United Kingdom and the European Union.

Despite decades of concerted efforts by the international community to counter activities that gravely threaten international peace and security, Iran remains a destabilizing actor across the Middle East region through a range of malign activities by its own military as well as by its support of a network of aligned, non-state militias and terrorist armed groups.

Iran and its proxies have heightened the risk of uncontrollable escalation and violence in the region through persistent attacks against neighbouring states, Israel, and U.S. and allied forces in the region. In 2024, Iran undertook two sets of large-scale, direct territorial attacks against Israel using ballistic missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)—also known as drones—a dangerous and unprecedented step that raises the stakes in a long-standing regional confrontation. As Iran continues to build networks to acquire and share weapons technology and expertise, the regime has also increased the operational coordination of its proxies, with multiple aligned armed groups launching attacks in Iraq and against Israel. 

Iran has also increased defence cooperation with and provided materiel support to Russia in its illegal war of aggression against Ukraine in the form of UAVs, ammunition and ballistic missiles. Canada and G7 partners have assessed that there is evidence that Iran has continued to transfer weaponry to Russia despite repeated international calls for this to stop. This represents a further escalation of Iran’s military support to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.

The Iranian regime poses a threat to international peace and security, both through its armed forces and through its support of its allies and proxies. Canada stands firm in responding to Iran’s actions and supporting those who courageously resist oppression under the Iranian regime in pursuit of fundamental human rights and justice.

Quotes

“The actions of the Iranian regime speak for themselves. The world has watched for years as this regime has pursued its agenda of violence, fear and propaganda. Canada is taking action against the Iranian regime whose complete disregard for regional peace and security will further escalate regional tensions and violence.”

- Mélanie Joly, Minister of Foreign Affairs 

Quick facts

  • Including these new measures, Canada has sanctioned 208 Iranian individuals and 254 entities. 

  • In 2012, Canada designated Iran as a state supporter of terrorism under the State Immunity Act. Along with the Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act, this listing allows victims to bring civil action against Iran for losses or damages from acts of terrorism with links to Iran committed anywhere in the world. 

  • In November 2022, Canada designated the Islamic Republic of Iran as a regime that has engaged in terrorism and systematic and gross human rights violations pursuant to subparagraph 35(1)(b) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. This means that tens of thousands of senior members of the Iranian regime, including many members of the IRGC, are inadmissible to Canada. 

  • In June 2024, Canada listed the IRGC as a terrorist entity under the Criminal Code in response to terrorist acts committed by the IRGC both on its own and in knowing association with listed terrorist entities, such as Hezbollah and Hamas. 

US President Donald Trump presents an executive order during the inaugural parade US, January 20, 2025.

Iran-born Canadians denied US entry - Globe and Mail

Canadian citizens born in Iran are being blocked from entering the United States after undergoing questioning at the border, the Canadian daily newspaper Globe and Mail reported citing immigration lawyers and advisers.

The report said that after President Donald Trump signed an executive order on his first day in office on Jan. 20 mandating enhanced scrutiny of foreign nationals Iranian-Canadians have faced heightened border security.

The report highlighted specific cases since that time, citing immigration lawyer Melissa Babel, who described two Iranian-Canadians who were recently denied entry.

According to Babel, both individuals, who had lived in Canada for decades, were questioned closely about their military service in Iran. US border agents asked them to provide proof that they had never served in the Iranian military, which is a major concern due to the US designation of the Iran's Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) as a terrorist organization​.

One of the men, who frequently traveled to the US for business, was denied entry and later found that his Nexus card—used for expedited US border processing—had been canceled. The other man, traveling with his Iranian-Canadian wife and Canadian-born daughter, was also refused entry​.

The report cited legal experts who have called on Ottawa to issue a travel advisory warning that Canadian citizens and residents from Iran risk being denied entry, having their visas or Nexus cards revoked, or even being detained or deported when traveling to the US.

Earlier this month, Reuters reported citing informed sources and an internal memo that the Trump administration is considering issuing sweeping travel restrictions for the citizens of dozens of countries as part of a new ban.

The memo lists a total of 41 countries divided into three separate groups. The first group of 10 countries, including Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, Cuba, and North Korea among others, would be set for a full visa suspension​.

https://www.iranintl.com/en/202503281881

  Transitions from authoritarian regimes to democracies offer valuable lessons in balancing external support with internal leadership. Countries like Germany and Japan rebuilt their political systems after devastating wars through substantial external aid, but their success stemmed from aligning reforms with their cultural contexts and ensuring active citizen participation.   Conversely, recent interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq highlight the dangers of imposing external solutions that overlook local dynamics. These experiences emphasize the need for grassroots-driven efforts to establish lasting democratic stability.  For 45 years, the Islamic Republic of Iran has stifled its citizens’ rights under a theocratic regime born from the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Yet, Iranians have persistently sought to dismantle this system and establish a secular, democratic alternative.  JPost Videos    A key example of this struggle occurred in September 2022, following the tragic death of Jina Mahsa Amini at the hands of the regime’s morality police. Her death ignited the “Woman, Life, Freedom” movement, sparking a nationwide uprising with millions on the street calling for not just reforms but full change of regime.  Widespread discontent, fueled by corruption, mismanagement, and economic hardships, coupled with the suppression of fundamental rights, has intensified internal pressure on the regime, leading to protests and calls for regime change.   People attend a protest over the death of Mahsa Amini, a woman who died after being arrested by the Islamic republic's ''morality police'', in Tehran, Iran, September 21, 2022. (credit: WANA (WEST ASIA NEWS AGENCY) VIA REUTERS)Enlrage image People attend a protest over the death of Mahsa Amini, a woman who died after being arrested by the Islamic republic's ''morality police'', in Tehran, Iran, September 21, 2022. (credit: WANA (WEST ASIA NEWS AGENCY) VIA REUTERS) Additionally, external factors – such as the weakening of the regime’s regional proxies, including Hamas, Hezbollah, and Assad’s government – have left the Islamic Republic more vulnerable than ever.  This raises critical questions: Will the regime survive, evolve, collapse, or be overthrown? How can a relatively peaceful and democratic transition be achieved, with safeguards in place to prevent violence, chaos, or the rise of another authoritarian regime?   The Iranian opposition forces have long envisioned creating a government-in-exile or an interim transitional council, often bringing together political parties, high-profile advocates, and celebrity figures from the diaspora. Yet, despite these efforts, success has remained elusive. Over the past 45 years, efforts to unite diverse political groups have repeatedly faltered.   Disparate visions for Iran’s future, ranging from a secular republic to a monarchy, have created deep ideological divisions and a persistent stalemate in coalition building. Competition and power struggles among opposition figures and their followers have further hindered meaningful collaboration, while the regime’s cyber army actively exacerbates these divides and mistrust.   Compounding these challenges is a widespread wariness of foreign assistance, rooted in a history of outside interventions. Brutal crackdowns not only have limited activists’ ability to organize internally but have also instilled fear, discouraging many from getting involved. Additionally, the diaspora often struggles with legitimacy to reflect the truest most up-to-date sentiments of those on the ground.    Stay updated with the latest news!  Subscribe to The Jerusalem Post Newsletter  Subscribe Now The Woman, Life, Freedom movement revealed the readiness, courage, and resilience of Iranian protesters but also exposed the costs of division. In just a couple of years of the movement, over 700 people, including 68 children, were killed, with thousands more imprisoned, blinded, or tortured. While the movement brought international attention, it underscored the urgent need for a cohesive strategy.   IRANIANS VOTE during the parliamentary election at a polling station in Tehran, on March 1. (credit: West Asian News Agency/Reuters)Enlrage image IRANIANS VOTE during the parliamentary election at a polling station in Tehran, on March 1. (credit: West Asian News Agency/Reuters) The key reason for stagnation in progress is that the Iranian opposition has repeatedly relied on the same traditional models and strategies to foster political coalition and unity, hoping for different outcomes.  It is time for the Iranian opposition to think beyond conventional approaches. What it requires is a new and fresh framework prioritizing shared objectives over individual agendas – a shift from the tried and tested coalition-building among groups to a model where expertise and management take precedence over identity politics.  Unity is not an impossible goal. A new paradigm must be developed that draws lessons from other successful movements while developing a unique, tailored strategy that resonates with the Iranian people and their specific struggle and immediate needs.  Forming a democracy commission TO ADDRESS these challenges and avoid past failures, the formation of an Iran Transition to Democracy Commission (ITDC) is essential. This interim body would comprise Iranian technocrats and experts dedicated to steering the country toward a democratic future.  The ITDC would serve as a non-partisan platform, prioritizing practical governance and inclusivity. While its selection process primarily focuses on skills, expertise, and capabilities, it ideally would reflect Iran’s rich diversity.  Initiatives such as rotating leadership roles would promote shared responsibility and balanced representation, fostering trust and collaboration within the group. By establishing a sister network that pairs advocates with partners within Iran, the ITDC can harmonize internal and external efforts, bridging any gaps and staying aligned with the realities on the ground.  The ITDC will act as a neutral platform, utilizing a structured, task-focused approach, managed like a project with clearly defined timelines. It will be divided into two key phases: pre-transition and post-transition, each ideally spanning 365 days or less.  The ITDC would focus on establishing credibility and organization by assembling committed, impartial, skilled technocrats, drafting a road map for transition, and creating a transparent, third-party-monitored “Freedom Fund” for financial accountability.  It would build domestic support by engaging civil society, unions, activists, entrepreneurs, and professionals. The ITDC would cultivate cohesion through non-political means but still seek support and endorsements from political leaders and other factions and emphasize non-partisan inclusivity.  International outreach would involve seeking recognition and support from governments, international organizations, NGOs, and the Iranian diaspora. Additionally, capacity building would include preparing for transitional governance by forming teams to manage key sectors like security, humanitarian relief, and economic stabilization.   After successfully completing the pre-transition phase and implementing an interim governance framework with well-defined, actionable plans that have garnered significant support from the Iranian community, coordinated calls will be issued for nationwide demonstrations, general strikes, and other collective actions designed to dismantle the existing regime.  The ITDC would ensure safety and order by maintaining public order and continuity of services. Stabilizing the economy would be a priority to prevent financial collapse and support economic recovery. The commission would facilitate the drafting of a new constitution through an elected assembly and prepare for elections by establishing commissions to ensure internationally monitored free and fair processes.  Democratic institutions, such as independent judicial, media, and administrative systems, would be developed. Additionally, the ITDC would strengthen international relations, cultivating trust and diplomatic, political, and economic partnerships to promote peace and diplomacy and attract aid and investment.  The ITDC pioneers an innovative blueprint for Iran’s transition, ensuring a peaceful, inclusive, and effective path to democracy. By fostering internal and international trust and adopting a project-based, non-partisan approach, the ITDC can provide a stable foundation for Iran’s future.   With careful planning and execution, it has the potential to inspire confidence and contribute to a more democratic and prosperous Iran, benefiting the broader Middle East region and the world.  The writer is an award-winning human rights and democracy advocate, co-founder of the Iranian Justice Collective and Stop Child Executions, and organizer of a network of over a hundred Iranian diaspora groups and other high-profile advocates from around the world.    Related Tags Human rights Iran Middle East democracy institute    Conversation4 Comments   Log in  Sign up   Sort by   Best   democracynetwork 16 January, 2025  A refreshing change from old paradigm to a new one   : “think beyond conventional approaches. a new and fresh framework prioritizing shared objectives over individual agendas – a shift from the tried and tested coalition-building among groups to a model where expertise and management take precedenc...  See more  Reply  5  2  Share Powered by TermsPrivacyFeedback Hot Opinion Jpost editorial logo  Netanyahu must choose compromise to preserve Israel's democracy By JPOST EDITORIAL Neville Teller  Qatar’s contradictions: Islamist terror ties and Western military alliances By NEVILLE TELLER Susan Hattis Rolef Qatargate raises unsettling questions over Netanyahu’s close entourage By SUSAN HATTIS ROLEF Yisrael Medad Not deep state, but dark state: When bureaucrats overrule Israeli democracy By YISRAEL MEDAD Sherwin Pomerantz When the opposition becomes the enemy: How the US, Israel are failing at democracy By SHERWIN POMERANTZ Most Read 1How much did it cost the US to intercept the missile launched from Yemen to Israel?  A US Army Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) weapon system is seen on Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, October 26, 2017. 2Hamas admits 72% of combat-aged fatalities are men, quietly reduces civilian death toll  Hamas admits 72% of deaths in Gaza are combat aged men as it quietly drops death count total (illustration). 3Former hostage Eliya Cohen breaks silence after 505 days in captivity  Freed hostage Eliya Cohen waves to Israelis upon his release from Gaza, February 22, 2025 4Anti-Israel activists chain themselves to Columbia gate demanding to know who reported Khalil Columbia student demonstrators chain themselves to the gates of St. Paul’s Chapel at Columbia University to denounce the arrest of Mahmoud Khalil in New York City, US, April 2, 2025. 5Iran's water crisis at tipping point in threat to Islamic regime's stability  Lake Urmia, a salty lake located in northwestern Iran between the provinces of West Azerbaijan and East Azerbaijan Advertisement

How to pave Iran's path to freedom - opinion

With careful planning, a transition commission has the potential to inspire confidence and contribute to a more democratic and prosperous Iran, benefitting the Middle East and the wider world.

The Renewed Power of Europe and Its Proximity to China

With Donald Trump’s return to the scene, his intervention in resolving the Russia-Ukraine clash has gained more traction. Under Trump’s mediation and his support in advancing the negotiations under the guise of ending the war, Russia can potentially preserve its occupied territories in eastern Ukraine. Consequently, Europe, sniffing the geopolitical games as an eminent threat to the continent, is determined to counter it to the degree that according to the European Commission President’s latest statement, “Europe must arm itself.” This echoes Macron’s 2018 statement that Europe needs its own independent army. 

Nevertheless, Ukraine and Western Europe are not the only parties for whom the Trump-Putin alliance has raised serious concerns. China is undoubtedly surveilling the situation closely. 

Given the gravity of such geopolitical equations, the depicted landscape may yield the following:

1)  The impending conflict between Ukraine and White House/Trump’s front will serve as a lever for Europe’s renewed military and economic independence.

2)  In broader terms, this major shift sets the stage for improving Europe’s proximity to China and potentially achieving global power equilibrium. However, Europe’s alignment with China is not ideological but rather commercial and perhaps, one day, military.

The Isolation of the United States

Trump’s strategy assumes that a peace deal in Ukraine would draw Russia closer, potentially creating a rift between Russia and China, weakening the latter. This was Nixon’s gambit, during whose office, the US engaged with China to create divisions among communist countries, pushing Russia away. Yet, such a plan today will likely yield indefensible consequences. Proximity to Russia would isolate US and push Europe towards China, granting the latter added influence.

3) Ultimately, Trump’s America versus Europe’s integrated empowerment and encouragement of China’s presence on the global stage profoundly jeopardizes world peace.

The time has come for both Europe and Canada to act independently of the United States. The Cold War mentality still grips Europe. If Europe enters the scene with full forces, establishing a unified global action with a robust military structure (the process which can be time-consuming, nonetheless), and even reaches some level of understanding with China, it sends alarming signals to both Trump and Putin, possibly urging them to reconsider jeopardizing the peace of the world. Only a third power can pacify these careless forces.

A Multinational European Army

In practice, Europe faces significant obstacles in establishing a powerful multinational military force. The United States and Russia will undoubtedly attempt to create divisions among European states to prevent such plots to advance. Historically, however, Western European nations have demonstrated greater political and strategic cohesion.

Hence, the first step in creating a European multinational army should be to establish its foundation in a core group of Western European nations rather than Eastern ones. This would likely include the United Kingdom, France, and Germany, followed by Italy and, progressively, other nations committed to the European project.

Moreover, if US were to withdraw from NATO, the remaining member states—with some exceptions aside, such as Turkey—might integrate into the new European military structure, transforming it into a powerful and influential force. In this scenario, Northern European nations would face fewer challenges in joining this new military alliance.

Considerations for Breaking the Deadlock

Achieving peace in parallel with these developments requires a series of strategic compromises:

  1. Ukraine must renounce its aspiration to join NATO. This is the most crucial step toward initiating meaningful negotiations to end the ongoing war.
  2. Ukraine must reach an agreement with the United States regarding its underground resources, a scenario that appears increasingly more likely to take hold.
  3. Once such agreement is reached, the United States, in turn, must guarantee Ukraine’s security.
  4. Russia would retain the occupied territories in Ukraine. While this is a contentious proposition, ending the war and preventing its expansion into other countries requires bold initiatives. Ultimately, it appears that this may be the only viable path for Russia’s withdrawal from further conflict.

However, such an agreement requires several key guarantees:

  • First, Russia must pledge not to launch further military aggression against Ukraine or any other European country.
  • Second, to ensure peace, Russia must accept that the United States and European nations act as the supportive guarantors of Ukraine’s security.

This could involve the deployment of Western (US and European) ground troops in Ukraine or the implementation of another security mechanism, which requires further deliberation by experts in the field.

 

Ata Hoodashtian

Ata Hoodashtian, Ph.D., is a Professor of Political Science based in Toronto. His most recent book: "Modern Political Leadership," Baran, Stockholm, 2022.

 

https://www.eurasiareview.com/06032025-breaking-the-ukrainian-impasse-and-rearming-europe-oped/

A B.C. Supreme Court judge has ordered an executive of an Iranian airline that was previously designated a terrorist entity to be extradited to the U.S. for alleged fraud against American banks. Photo by Arlen Redekop /PNG

B.C. judge orders Iranian detainee extradited to U.S. to face fraud, money laundering charges

Seyed Abood Sari has been battling extradition to U.S., which has a warrant for his arrest for alleged fraud charges, according to a B.C. Supreme Court ruling

Javad Soleimani speaks at a memorial about his wife Elnaz Nabiyi, killed by an Iranian missile attack on a passenger plane. Julien Fournier / Global News

‘Safe haven’: Iranian Canadians urge Ottawa to weed out regime officials

Liberal MP Patrick Weiler speaks in the House of Commons about Canada’s ban on senior Iranian regime officials, April 15, 2024. House of Commons

Latest accused Iran official caught in Canada sues immigration department

Another senior member of Iran’s regime caught in Canada, CBSA says

Former justice minister Irwin Cotler says RCMP told him Iranian plot to kill him was foiled

CBC News

Cotler says he has been protected by RCMP day and night for more than a year